Mexican President Felipe Calderon for supporting the removal of all weapons from civilian hands while doing next to nothing about the drug cartels–who have all the guns they want, and then using the Aurora, Colorado tragedy to scold the U.S. for poor gun laws.

To be completely fair, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder did (I believe) have his hands in the transport of U.S. weapons across the border into Mexico and into the hands of drug cartel members.  Operation “Fast and Furious” not only aided the cartels but left one U.S. Border Patrol agent dead.  –SB


[ ]

Felipe Calderón’s Arrogant Call for U.S. Gun Control

The blood had barely dried in the tragic Aurora, Colorado, shooting before Mexican president Felipe Calderón put the blame on permissive U.S. gun laws.  In a post on his Twitter account, Calderón offered his condolences to the victims but then added that the incident showed that “the American Congress must review its mistaken legislation on guns.  It’s doing damage to us all.”

It was hardly a new theme from Mexico’s lame-duck president.  But his latest statement requires an extraordinary amount of gall.  During Calderón’s presidency, more than fifty thousand of his people have died in the war on drugs that he chose to escalate.  A foreign leader with that awful of a track record daring to lecture the United States on its policies regarding firearms is not likely to sit well with most Americans.

But Calderón repeatedly has blamed U.S. gun laws rather than his decision to launch a military-led offensive against the drug cartels for the resulting violence in his country.  The Mexican government even posted a massive sign on the border with the United States between Ciudad Juarez and El Paso reading “No More Weapons!”  The sign was made from recycled guns seized by Mexican security forces.

But the location of that sign undercuts Calderón’s own argument.  Juarez has been for the past five years the epicenter of gun violence in Mexico.  Yet El Paso has a very low violent-crime rate.  If “lax” U.S. gun laws were the cause of the carnage in Juarez, wouldn’t El Paso also be awash in blood?  Some other factor must account for the extraordinary violence south of the border.

Extensive research on restrictive gun laws in both U.S. and foreign jurisdictions shows no correlation between tough laws and a decline in homicides and other crimes.  Mexico’s own experience confirms that point.  Following sometimes violent radical leftist challenges to the government in the late 1960s, Mexico enacted some of the strictest gun-control measures in the world.  Today, it is nearly impossible for a civilian to possess a handgun or rifle legally in that country.  Yet such tough restrictions have done nothing to disarm the drug gangs.  In fact, those measures may have made it easier for cartel enforcers to terrorize portions of the country, since they don’t have to worry much about law-abiding civilians being armed and able to defend themselves and their families.

Conversely, the trend over the past decade or so in various jurisdictions throughout the United States toward conceal-carry and other permissive policies regarding firearms has not produced the surge of killings that gun-control zealots predicted.  To the contrary, the rates of homicides and other violent crimes in most of those jurisdictions have actually gone down.

Calderón should have had the decency not to exploit the Aurora tragedy to push his misguided gun-control agenda for the United States.  During his remaining months in office, he should instead focus on easing the suffering that his policies have caused in his own country.

Image: expertinfantry